On 23/05/2024 16:35, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:38:02PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:Currrentl a 32 bit 1u value is being shifted more than 32 bits causing overflow and incorrect checking of bits 32-63. Fix this by using the BIT_ULL macro for shifting bits. Detected by cppcheck: sev_init2_tests.c:108:34: error: Shifting 32-bit value by 63 bits is undefined behaviour [shiftTooManyBits] Fixes: dfc083a181ba ("selftests: kvm: add tests for KVM_SEV_INIT2") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c index 7a4a61be119b..ea09f7a06aa4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c @@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ void test_features(uint32_t vm_type, uint64_t supported_features) int i;for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {- if (!(supported_features & (1u << i))) + if (!(supported_features & BIT_ULL(i))) test_init2_invalid(vm_type, &(struct kvm_sev_init){ .vmsa_features = BIT_ULL(i) }, "unknown feature"); - else if (KNOWN_FEATURES & (1u << i)) + else if (KNOWN_FEATURES & BIT_ULL(u))^ Should be i. How does this build? :P
good catch, I sent the wrong one :-(
regards, dan carpenter
