Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: topology: Constify an argument of snd_soc_tplg_component_load()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/13/2024 7:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
snd_soc_tplg_component_load() does not modify its "*ops" argument. It
only read some values and stores it in "soc_tplg.ops".

This argument and the ops field in "struct soc_tplg" can be made const.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/sound/soc-topology.h | 2 +-
  sound/soc/soc-topology.c     | 4 ++--
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-topology.h b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
index f055c6917f6c..1eedd203ac29 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-topology.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline const void *snd_soc_tplg_get_data(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr)
/* Dynamic Object loading and removal for component drivers */
  int snd_soc_tplg_component_load(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
-	struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops, const struct firmware *fw);
+	const struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops, const struct firmware *fw);
  int snd_soc_tplg_component_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp);
/* Binds event handlers to dynamic widgets */
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
index 90ca37e008b3..b00ec01361c2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct soc_tplg {
  	int bytes_ext_ops_count;
/* optional fw loading callbacks to component drivers */
-	struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops;
+	const struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops;
  };
/* check we dont overflow the data for this control chunk */
@@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ static int soc_tplg_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg)
/* load audio component topology from "firmware" file */
  int snd_soc_tplg_component_load(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
-	struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops, const struct firmware *fw)
+	const struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops, const struct firmware *fw)
  {
  	struct soc_tplg tplg;
  	int ret;

Yes, makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux