On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:27 AM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After a successful pci_iomap_range() call, pci_iounmap() should be called
> in the error handling path, as already done in the remove function.
>
> Add the missing call.
>
> The corresponding call was added in the remove function in commit
> 5ee109828e73 ("VMCI: dma dg: allocate send and receive buffers for DMA
> datagrams")
>
> Fixes: e283a0e8b7ea ("VMCI: dma dg: add MMIO access to registers")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vishnu Dasa <vishnu.dasa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c
> index c61e8953511d..476af89e751b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c
> @@ -625,7 +625,8 @@ static int vmci_guest_probe_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (!vmci_dev) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "Can't allocate memory for VMCI device\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + error = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_unmap_mmio_base;
> }
>
> vmci_dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -642,7 +643,8 @@ static int vmci_guest_probe_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (!vmci_dev->tx_buffer) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "Can't allocate memory for datagram tx buffer\n");
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + error = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_unmap_mmio_base;
> }
>
> vmci_dev->data_buffer = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, VMCI_DMA_DG_BUFFER_SIZE,
> @@ -892,6 +894,10 @@ static int vmci_guest_probe_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> err_free_data_buffers:
> vmci_free_dg_buffers(vmci_dev);
>
> +err_unmap_mmio_base:
> + if (mmio_base != NULL)
> + pci_iounmap(pdev, mmio_base);
> +
> /* The rest are managed resources and will be freed by PCI core */
> return error;
> }
> --
> 2.44.0
>
