On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 05:43:16PM -0700, Jameson Thies wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > what are your thoughts on Abhishek's comment? I think we should > attempt to register the alternate mode when CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is > not enabled. It would give us a more accurate representation of the > partner in user space. I understand your point about ignoring a > potential EOPNOTSUPP response from the non-stub function. What if we > leave ucsi.c alone, and replace the stub function's null return with a > call to typec_port_register_altmode(). That would register DP altmode > as an unsupported mode when CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is not enabled, > and fix the null pointer dereference. But, it won't change behavior > when CONFIG_TYPEC_DP_ALTMODE is enabled. Yes, this sounds like a perfect idea! > > Hi Markus, > thanks for your feedback. I'll update the commit message to say "null > pointer dereference" when I upload a v3 series. > > Thanks, > Jameson -- With best wishes Dmitry
