On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 08:15:25AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > If the device register fails, free the allocated memory before > > returning. > > Can a description variant (like the following) be more appropriate? > > Free the allocated memory (after a device registration failure) > before returning. > Thus add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better > reused at the end of this function implementation. > > > Would you like to replace the word “register” by “registration” also > in the summary phrase? > Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
