> A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (2): I would appreciate a bit more information about the reasons why this patch series was rejected. > One function call less in vas_window_alloc() after error detection https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/1f1c21cf-c34c-418c-b00c-8e6474f12612@xxxxxx/ > Return directly after a failed kasprintf() in map_paste_region() https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/f46f04bc-613c-4e98-b602-4c5120556b09@xxxxxx/ > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-window.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Regards, Markus
