在 2024/3/8 01:23, Dan Carpenter 写道:
This check "if (inherit->num_qgroups > PAGE_SIZE)" is confusing and unnecessary. The problem with the check is that static checkers flag it as a potential mixup of between units of bytes vs number of elements. Fortunately, the check can safely be deleted because the next check is correct and applies an even stricter limit: if (size != struct_size(inherit, qgroups, inherit->num_qgroups)) return -EINVAL; The "inherit" struct ends in a variable array of __u64 and "inherit->num_qgroups" is the number of elements in the array. At the start of the function we check that: if (size < sizeof(*inherit) || size > PAGE_SIZE) return -EINVAL; Thus, since we verify that the whole struct fits within one page, that means that the number of elements in the inherit->qgroups[] array must be less than PAGE_SIZE. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx> I'm not 100% sure about the original code either, thanks for confirming the existing one has no effect and can be removed. Thanks, Qu
--- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 5f90f0605b12..a8197e25192c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3067,9 +3067,6 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_check_inherit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, if (inherit->num_ref_copies > 0 || inherit->num_excl_copies > 0) return -EINVAL; - if (inherit->num_qgroups > PAGE_SIZE) - return -EINVAL; - if (size != struct_size(inherit, qgroups, inherit->num_qgroups)) return -EINVAL;
