On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:48:58PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The extra curly braces are absolutely not needed. The for loop's body
> > already defines scope, __cleanup()s should be called at the end of the body.
>
> I present an other development opinion here.
> I got the impression that the required scope should be smaller for
> the adjusted local variable “ev_node” (according to the previous function implementation).
>
> Otherwise:
> How do you think about to move any source code part from the loop
> into a separate function?
No, it should simply look like this:
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/iqs269a.c b/drivers/input/misc/iqs269a.c
index cd14ff9f57cf..98119c48c65f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/iqs269a.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/iqs269a.c
@@ -557,7 +557,6 @@ static int iqs269_parse_chan(struct iqs269_private *iqs269,
const struct fwnode_handle *ch_node)
{
struct i2c_client *client = iqs269->client;
- struct fwnode_handle *ev_node;
struct iqs269_ch_reg *ch_reg;
u16 engine_a, engine_b;
unsigned int reg, val;
@@ -734,8 +733,9 @@ static int iqs269_parse_chan(struct iqs269_private *iqs269,
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iqs269_events); i++) {
- ev_node = fwnode_get_named_child_node(ch_node,
- iqs269_events[i].name);
+ struct fwnode_handle *ev_node __free(fwnode_handle) =
+ fwnode_get_named_child_node(ch_node,
+ iqs269_events[i].name);
if (!ev_node)
continue;
@@ -744,7 +744,6 @@ static int iqs269_parse_chan(struct iqs269_private *iqs269,
dev_err(&client->dev,
"Invalid channel %u threshold: %u\n",
reg, val);
- fwnode_handle_put(ev_node);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -758,7 +757,6 @@ static int iqs269_parse_chan(struct iqs269_private *iqs269,
dev_err(&client->dev,
"Invalid channel %u hysteresis: %u\n",
reg, val);
- fwnode_handle_put(ev_node);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -774,7 +772,6 @@ static int iqs269_parse_chan(struct iqs269_private *iqs269,
}
error = fwnode_property_read_u32(ev_node, "linux,code", &val);
- fwnode_handle_put(ev_node);
if (error == -EINVAL) {
continue;
} else if (error) {
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
