Re: [PATCH][next] drivers: net: xgene: remove redundant assignment to variable offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2024 13:40, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:39:24PM +0000, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
On 08.02.2024 12:20, Colin Ian King wrote:
The variable offset is being initialized with a value that is never
read, it is being re-assigned later on in either path of an if
statement before being used. The initialization is redundant and
can be removed.

Cleans up clang scan build warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c:736:2: warning: Value
stored to 'offset' is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c | 1 -
   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
index de5464322311..8f104642897b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
@@ -733,7 +733,6 @@ static int xgene_cle_setup_rss(struct xgene_enet_pdata *pdata)
   	u32 offset, val = 0;
   	int i, ret = 0;
-	offset = CLE_PORT_OFFSET;
   	for (i = 0; i < cle->parsers; i++) {
   		if (cle->active_parser != PARSER_ALL)
   			offset = cle->active_parser * CLE_PORT_OFFSET;

It looks like more refactoring can be done here.
"if (cle->active_parser != PARSER_ALL)" is static, no need to check it inside
the loop.


You still need to check...  I don't really think it's an improvement.

regards,
dan carpenter

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
index de5464322311..61e31cc55771 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_cle.c
@@ -733,11 +733,11 @@ static int xgene_cle_setup_rss(struct xgene_enet_pdata *pdata)
  	u32 offset, val = 0;
  	int i, ret = 0;
- offset = CLE_PORT_OFFSET;
+	if (cle->active_parser != PARSER_ALL)
+		offset = cle->active_parser * CLE_PORT_OFFSET;
+

I think we can add "else" here and avoid the loop in case of != PARSER_ALL and avoid "if" in the loop, wdyt?

  	for (i = 0; i < cle->parsers; i++) {
-		if (cle->active_parser != PARSER_ALL)
-			offset = cle->active_parser * CLE_PORT_OFFSET;
-		else
+		if (cle->active_parser == PARSER_ALL)
  			offset = i * CLE_PORT_OFFSET;
/* enable RSS */





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux