Re: [PATCH v2] nvmem: u-boot-env: improve error checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30.01.2024 20:42, Nick Spooner wrote:
Coverity scan reported CID 1575482: error handling issues; this patch
addresses this by adding error handling to u_boot_env_add_cells.

I'd appreciate description why do we need this change other than
addressing some Coverity report.

Should a single nvmem_add_one_cell() failure result in not registering
NVMEM device at all? Why?


Signed-off-by: Nick Spooner <nicholas.spooner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
     Fix whitespace issues in previous version

  drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c b/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
index befbab156cda..c15de5f7fd99 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static int u_boot_env_add_cells(struct u_boot_env *priv, uint8_t *buf,
  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
  	char *data = buf + data_offset;
  	char *var, *value, *eq;
+	int rval;

  	for (var = data;
  	     var < data + data_len && *var;
@@ -119,7 +120,9 @@ static int u_boot_env_add_cells(struct u_boot_env *priv, uint8_t *buf,
  			info.read_post_process = u_boot_env_read_post_process_ethaddr;
  		}

-		nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
+		rval = nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
+		if (rval)
+			return rval;
  	}

  	return 0;
--
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux