Hi, On 1/28/24 11:45, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Thank you for your patch/series, I've applied this patch >> (series) to my review-hans branch: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans >> >> Note it will show up in the pdx86 review-hans branch once I've >> pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. > > Will development interests grow for the application of known scripts > also according to the semantic patch language? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?h=v6.8-rc1#n71 Markus, I'm not sure what your question here is? Is it: "Will coccinelle scripts be run as part of the regular patch test/merge workflow?" then the answer is that there are no plans that I'm aware of to do that at this moment. If such a thing were to be done, IMHO it would be best to have one of the existing CI systems like e.h. Intel's LKP test bot run this on linux-next, or on all the trees LKP already monitors. And it does sound like something interesting to do, but someone would need to actually setup and maintain such a CI system. If the question is: "Are patches generated by coccinelle welcome?" then the answer is "Yes patches generated by coccinelle are very much welcome". Regards, Hans
