On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:57:42PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 22/01/2024 à 12:29, Mika Westerberg a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:10:21PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated > > > ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove(). > > > > > > Note that the upper limit of ida_simple_get() is exclusive, but the one of > > > ida_alloc_range()/ida_alloc_max() is inclusive. So a -1 has been added > > > when needed. > > > > Looks tood to me but wanted to check if you tested this on a real > > hardware or you just build tested? > > > > > > Hi, > > It was compile tested only. > > Transformation has been done with the help of the cocci script below. Okay that's what I thought too. I ran some testing on a real hardware and did not see any issues. Applied to thunderbolt.git/next, thanks!
