Re: leds: trigger: oneshot: One function call less in pattern_init() after error detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> The kfree() function was called in one case by
>> the pattern_init() function during error handling
>> even if the passed variable contained a null pointer.
>
> It's totally valid to call kfree() on a NULL pointer:
>
>   * If @object is NULL, no operation is performed.
>
> Why do we care all that much?

Would you dare to categorise such special function calls as redundant?

Should they be skipped in more cases?

See also:
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/MEM12-C.+Consider+using+a+goto+chain+when+leaving+a+function+on+error+when+using+and+releasing+resources


Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux