ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().
This is less verbose.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
index 5cf770a1bc31..9685645bfe04 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
- pmu->id = ida_simple_get(&ddr_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pmu->id = ida_alloc(&ddr_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, DDR_PERF_DEV_NAME "%d", pmu->id);
if (!name) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cpuhp_remove_multi_state(pmu->cpuhp_state);
cpuhp_state_err:
format_string_err:
- ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
+ ida_free(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX9 DDR Perf PMU failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
- ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
+ ida_free(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
