Re: [PATCH] driver base: slience unused warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a W=1 static checker warning.  We've already reviewed it, and
marked it as old.  There isn't anything else required.

Or are we close to promoting the unused-but-set-variable warning from
W=1 to being on by default?  How many of these warnings are remaining?
It it's like only 20-50 warnings left then maybe we should consider the
other options but that kind of information needs to be in the cover
letter or otherwise we won't know about it.

regards,
dan carpenter



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux