Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/tv: avoid possible division by zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 17.07.2023 08:22, Su Hui wrote:
Clang warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c:
line 991, column 22 Division by zero.
Assuming tv_mode->oversample=1 and (!tv_mode->progressive)=1,
then division by zero will happen.

Fixes: 1bba5543e4fe ("drm/i915: Fix TV encoder clock computation")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
index 36b479b46b60..82b54af51f23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
@@ -988,7 +988,8 @@ intel_tv_mode_to_mode(struct drm_display_mode *mode,
  		      const struct tv_mode *tv_mode,
  		      int clock)
  {
-	mode->clock = clock / (tv_mode->oversample >> !tv_mode->progressive);
+	mode->clock = clock / (tv_mode->oversample != 1 ?
+			tv_mode->oversample >> !tv_mode->progressive : 1);

Seems too smart to me, why not just:
mode->clock = clock / tv_mode->oversample;
if (!tv_mode->progressive)
    mode->clock <<= 1;
Or trying being smart:
mode->clock = clock / tv_mode->oversample << !tv_mode->progressive;

Btw in both cases there is assumption tv_mode->oversample != 0, I guess it is true.

Regards
Andrzej

/*
  	 * tv_mode horizontal timings:




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux