Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()
From: linke li <lilinke99@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:10:29 +0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Linke Li <lilinke99@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <63c6f039-4b33-cdfc-1e49-fc9fc35d513e@web.de>
References: <tencent_4D921A8D1F69E70C85C28875DC829E28EC09@qq.com> <63c6f039-4b33-cdfc-1e49-fc9fc35d513e@web.de>

Dear Markus,

Thank you for your valuable feedback, I apologize for my typo in the
description.

> How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes”?

I agree with that.

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix undefined behavior in PAGE_MASK calculation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC/i10nm: shift exponent is negative
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix undefined behavior in PAGE_MASK calculation
Next by thread: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] Remove unnecessary (void*) conversions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux