> >> * Would an other listing style become nicer for the “patch changelog”? > > > > This is a complete waste of contributor time. > > I would like to point further possibilities out once more. > > The arrow notation is also demonstrated in the Linux development > documentation. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu > mentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.4#n698 > > Various patches show that more succinct version identifiers are also accepted. > If a bit of duplicate data can be avoided in the version history, the > maintenance of corresponding version descriptions can be improved > accordingly. Hi Markus, Do you suggest to use following? Changelog: V2: Changes in v2 xxx V1: Changes in v1 xxx A bit lost on the suggestion here. > > Regards, > Markus
