> Unfortunately, it seems that the patch quality was still improvable. It was not perfect but good enough. > * How will the patch integration evolve further for suggestions which seem to be > still in waiting queues? Easy, it will evolve quite similar with the amount of review/reviewers. > * How far back would you like to support the known development history > for discussed Linux software components? Dunno, if I got the question right, but I don't want to break existing stuff. Why do you ask?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
