On Tue, 30 May 2023, Markus Elfring wrote: > … > > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/null/kmerr.cocci > … > > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ position any withtest.p; > > identifier f; > > @@ > > > > -x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\)(...); > > +x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|devm_kmalloc\|kmalloc_array\|devm_kmalloc_array\|krealloc_array\|kzalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kcalloc\|kasprintf\|devm_kasprintf\|kstrdup\|kstrdup_const\)(...); > > ... > > x1@p = f@p2(...); > > if (!x1) S > > Can it be nicer to specify desired function names on multiple lines > for such a SmPL disjunction? > > Would you sort them according to their call probability? Please don't follow either of these suggestions. julia
