On 5/25/23 07:33, Markus Elfring wrote:
The return value was overlooked from a call of
the function “fb_alloc_cmap”.
* Thus use a corresponding error check.
* Add two jump targets so that a bit of exception handling
can be better reused at the end of this function.
…
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c
…
@@ -1452,17 +1452,25 @@ static int init_imstt(struct fb_info *info)
FBINFO_HWACCEL_FILLRECT |
FBINFO_HWACCEL_YPAN;
- fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 0, 0);
+ ret = fb_alloc_cmap(&info->cmap, 0, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ goto release_framebuffer;
if (register_framebuffer(info) < 0) {
- framebuffer_release(info);
- return -ENODEV;
+ fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+ goto e_nodev;
}
tmp = (read_reg_le32(par->dc_regs, SSTATUS) & 0x0f00) >> 8;
fb_info(info, "%s frame buffer; %uMB vram; chip version %u\n",
info->fix.id, info->fix.smem_len >> 20, tmp);
return 0;
+
+e_nodev:
+ ret = -ENODEV;
I think the return value isn't checked at all, so you could
simply return below "-ENODEV" for all cases (instead of "return ret").
Then you don't need the e_nodev label and can simplify the flow.
Can it be helpful to distinguish involved error codes better?
No.
Helge