Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: b53: Slightly optimize b53_arl_read()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 21/04/2023 à 02:40, Florian Fainelli a écrit :


On 4/20/2023 1:44 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
When the 'free_bins' bitmap is cleared, it is better to use its full
maximum size instead of only the needed size.
This lets the compiler optimize it because the size is now known at compile time. B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES is small (i.e. currently 4), so a call to
memset() is saved.

Also, as 'free_bins' is local to the function, the non-atomic __set_bit()
can also safely be used here.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
index 3464ce5e7470..8c55fe0e0747 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static int b53_arl_read(struct b53_device *dev, u64 mac,
      if (ret)
          return ret;
-    bitmap_zero(free_bins, dev->num_arl_bins);
+    bitmap_zero(free_bins, B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES);

That one I am not a big fan, as the number of ARL bins is a function of the switch model, and this illustrates it well.

Ok, up to you to take or not what looks the better solution.

From my point of view, the "for (i = 0; i < dev->num_arl_bins" below illustrates it better.


Maybe, another approach to save the memset() call would be remove the bitmap_zero() call, and declare 'free_bins' as:

   DECLARE_BITMAP(free_bins, B53_ARLTBL_MAX_BIN_ENTRIES) = { };
(this syntax is already used in b53_configure_vlan())


The compiler should still be able to optimize the initialisation and this wouldn't, IMHO, introduce confusion about the intent.

Let me know if you prefer to leave this hunk as-is, or if this other alternative pleases you.


CJ


      /* Read the bins */
      for (i = 0; i < dev->num_arl_bins; i++) {
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static int b53_arl_read(struct b53_device *dev, u64 mac,
          b53_arl_to_entry(ent, mac_vid, fwd_entry);
          if (!(fwd_entry & ARLTBL_VALID)) {
-            set_bit(i, free_bins);
+            __set_bit(i, free_bins);

I would be keen on taking that hunk but keep the other as-is. Does that work for you?
--
Florian





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux