On 3/29/23 03:12, Markus Elfring wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:50:44 +0200
1. Return directly after a call of the function “kzalloc” failed
at the beginning in these function implementations.
2. Omit extra initialisations (for a few local variables)
which became unnecessary with this refactoring.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thanks, I have pulled this into the apparmor tree
---
security/apparmor/crypto.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/crypto.c b/security/apparmor/crypto.c
index b498ed302461..6724e2ff6da8 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/crypto.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/crypto.c
@@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ unsigned int aa_hash_size(void)
char *aa_calc_hash(void *data, size_t len)
{
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, apparmor_tfm);
- char *hash = NULL;
- int error = -ENOMEM;
+ char *hash;
+ int error;
if (!apparmor_tfm)
return NULL;
hash = kzalloc(apparmor_hash_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!hash)
- goto fail;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
desc->tfm = apparmor_tfm;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int aa_calc_profile_hash(struct aa_profile *profile, u32 version, void *start,
size_t len)
{
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, apparmor_tfm);
- int error = -ENOMEM;
+ int error;
__le32 le32_version = cpu_to_le32(version);
if (!aa_g_hash_policy)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int aa_calc_profile_hash(struct aa_profile *profile, u32 version, void *start,
profile->hash = kzalloc(apparmor_hash_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!profile->hash)
- goto fail;
+ return -ENOMEM;
desc->tfm = apparmor_tfm;
--
2.40.0
