On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:46:57 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote: > This is only for networking. > > It affect BPF too, I suppose, but I always tell everyone to just send > BPF bug reports instead of patches. I can keep track of linux-next, net > and net-next. No one can keep track of all @#$@#$@#$@# 300+ trees. > > I really hate this networking requirement but I try really hard to get > it right and still mess up half the time. Don't worry about it too much, there needs to be a level of understanding for cross-tree folks. This unfortunately may not be afforded to less known developers.. because we don't know them/that they are working cross-tree. Reality check for me - this is really something that should be handled by our process scripts, right? get_maintainer/ /checkpatch ? Or that's not a fair expectation.
