On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:47:52PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2/1/23 23:10, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > This code accidentally reuses "tries" as the iterator for both the inside > > and outside loops. It means that the potentially the "tries" could be > > reset to 0x1000 and never reach 0x5000. > > > > Fixes: 669a5db411d8 ("[libata] Add a bunch of PATA drivers.") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c > > index 617c95522f43..447dc287a2d4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c > > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c > > @@ -380,14 +380,14 @@ static int hpt3xn_calibrate_dpll(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > > u8 reg5b; > > u32 reg5c; > > - int tries; > > + int tries, tries2; > > > > for (tries = 0; tries < 0x5000; tries++) { > > udelay(50); > > pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x5b, ®5b); > > if (reg5b & 0x80) { > > /* See if it stays set */ > > - for (tries = 0; tries < 0x1000; tries++) { > > + for (tries2 = 0; tries2 < 0x1000; tries2++) { > > pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x5b, ®5b); > > /* Failed ? */ > > if ((reg5b & 0x80) == 0) > > I am assuming this one is the same as for pata_hpt37x: a false positive ? Yes, sorry. regards, dan carpenter