On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:04:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in <include/dcache.h>, it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that <linux/bit_spinlock.h> > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc. > > Include <asm/processor.h> in <linux/bit_spinlock.h> to fix the issue. > This will help remove some un-needed includes from <include/dcache.h>. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301082130.LXMj5qkD-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Not sure who to send this to. > get_maintainer.pl is of no help, and the file is untouched from a too long > time. > > Greg? Dan? Any pointer? Andrew Morton is the maintainer of last resort. Plus spinlocks seem like something he would be interested in. Otherwise Ingo, Peter Z and the x86 team. regards, dan carpenter
