On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote: > @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb) > * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the > * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it. > * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with > - * work cancelation off the exec path. > + * work cancellation off the exec path. > */ > if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle)) > io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx); > @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd) > bool loop = false; > > io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current); > - /* read completions before cancelations */ > + /* read completions before cancellations */ "cancelations" is not a typo. "cancelations" and "cancellations" are both valid spellings. The former is predominantly used in the US, while the latter is predominantly used in the UK. -- Ammar Faizi
