On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:27:00 +0100 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > My main point is in the cover letter. I look for feed-back to know if > patches like that are welcomed. Only the first, Only the second, Both or > None. Sorry, missed that. > These patches (at least 1 and 2) can be seen as an RFC for net > MAINTAINERS, to see if there is any interest in: > - axing useless netif_napi_del() calls, when free_netdev() is called > just after. (patch 1) I think it'd be too much noise. I'd vote no. > - simplifying code with axing the error handling path of the probe > and the remove function in favor of using devm_ functions (patch 2) I believe DaveM was historically opposed to those helpers in general. I think we should avoid pure conversions, unless they are part of development of new features or fix bugs.
