On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 10:06:31AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> In an earlier commit, I added a bounds check to prevent an out of bounds
> read and a WARN(). On further discussion and consideration that check
> was probably too aggressive. Instead of returning -EINVAL, a better fix
> would be to just prevent the out of bounds read but continue the process.
>
> Background: The value of "pp->rxq_def" is a number between 0-7 by default,
> or even higher depending on the value of "rxq_number", which is a module
> parameter. If the value is more than the number of available CPUs then
> it will trigger the WARN() in cpu_max_bits_warn().
>
> Fixes: e8b4fc13900b ("net: mvneta: Prevent out of bounds read in mvneta_config_rss()")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: fix the subject to say net instead of net-next.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the followup,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
