On Thu, 03 Nov 2022, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't populate two read-only arrays on the stack but instead make
> them static const . Also makes the object code a little smaller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 4671dc23abe0..50d488cc840e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3916,8 +3916,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> struct drm_display_mode *newmode;
> struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> const struct cvt_timing *cvt;
> - const int rates[] = { 60, 85, 75, 60, 50 };
> - const u8 empty[3] = { 0, 0, 0 };
> + static const int rates[] = { 60, 85, 75, 60, 50 };
> + static const u8 empty[3] = { 0, 0, 0 };
The change is fine per se, but I think this whole array is silly. Could
be removed with:
- if (!memcmp(cvt->code, empty, 3))
+ if (!memchr_inv(cvt->code, 0, sizeof(cvt->code)))
BR,
Jani.
PS. I also note that rates[0] is never used, but that's another story,
maybe a bug.
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> int width, height;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
