Re: [PATCH 09/30] ACPI: sysfs: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> 
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
> 
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is part of a serie that axes all usages of strtobool().
> Each patch can be applied independently from the other ones.
> 
> The last patch of the serie removes the definition of strtobool().
> 
> You may not be in copy of the cover letter. So, if needed, it is available
> at [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> index cc2fe0618178..2d81c742e4d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  
>  #include "internal.h"
> @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ static ssize_t force_remove_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  	bool val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = strtobool(buf, &val);
> +	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux