[PATCH] NFSD: Fix the share reservation conflict to courteous server logic in nfs4_upgrade_open()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



'status != nfserr_share_denied' is known to be true because we test
'status == nfs_ok' the line just above.

So nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked() can never be called.

Fix the logic and avoid the dead code.

Fixes: 3d6942715180 ("NFSD: add support for share reservation conflict to courteous server")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is speculative.
It is compile tested only.

REVIEW WITH CARE.
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 1ded89235111..de0565e9485c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5260,15 +5260,13 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
 	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
 	status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);
 	if (status == nfs_ok) {
-		if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
-			set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
-			fp->fi_share_deny |=
+		set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
+		fp->fi_share_deny |=
 				(open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
-		} else {
-			if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false,
-					stp, open->op_share_deny, false))
-				status = nfserr_jukebox;
-		}
+	} else if (status == nfserr_share_denied) {
+		if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false, stp,
+				open->op_share_deny, false))
+			status = nfserr_jukebox;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
 
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux