On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:00:50PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 09/08/2022 à 18:20, Jason Gunthorpe a écrit : > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 09:56:13PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > L and S are swapped/ > > > s/VFIO_FLS_MC/VFIO_FSL_MC/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > All the dev_ logging functions in the file have the "VFIO_FSL_MC: " > > > prefix. > > > As they are dev_ function, the driver should already be displayed. > > > > > > So, does it make sense or could they be all removed? > > > --- > > > drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > > > index 3feff729f3ce..66d01db1d240 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > > > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void vfio_fsl_mc_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) > > > if (WARN_ON(ret)) > > > dev_warn(&mc_cont->dev, > > > - "VFIO_FLS_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret); > > > + "VFIO_FSL_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret); > > > > WARN_ON already prints, this is better written as > > > > WARN(ret, "VFIO_FSL_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret); > > Or maybe, just: > if (ret) > dev_warn(&mc_cont->dev, > "VFIO_FSL_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret); > > This keep information about the device, avoid the duplicate printing related > to WARN_ON+dev_warn and is more in line with error handling in other files. > > Do you agree or do you prefer a v2 as you proposed with WARN()? If the original author wrote WARN I would not degrade it to just a dev_warn. Jason
