On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:20 PM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/07/2022 13:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 1:40 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:52 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:17:38 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:00 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Commit 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()") > >>>>> introduces the config symbol GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED, but then > >>>>> falsely refers to CONFIG_GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED (note the missing LIB > >>>>> in the reference) in ./include/asm-generic/io.h. > >>>>> > >>>>> Luckily, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py warns on non-existing configs: > >>>>> > >>>>> GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > >>>>> Referencing files: include/asm-generic/io.h > >>>>> > >>>>> Correct the name of the config to the intended one. > >>>>> > >>>>> Fixes: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()") > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Thanks. I'm going to assume this is going in through some other tree, > >>> but IIUC I sent the buggy patch up so LMK if you're expecting it to go > >>> through mine. > >> > >> Palmer, Arnd, > >> > >> the patch in this mail thread got lost and was not picked up yet. > >> > >> MAINTAINERS suggests that Arnd takes patches to include/asm-generic/, > >> since commit 1527aab617af ("asm-generic: list Arnd as asm-generic > >> maintainer") in 2009, but maybe the responsibility for those files has > >> actually moved on to somebody (or nobody) else and we just did not > >> record that yet in MAINTAINERS. > >> > >> Arnd, will you pick this patch and provide it further to Linus Torvalds? > >> > >> Otherwise, Palmer already suggested picking it up himself. > >> > > > > I've applied it to the asm-generic tree and can send it as a bugfix > > pull request. I don't have any other fixer for that branch at the moment, > > so if Palmer has other fixes for the riscv tree already, it would > > save me making a pull request if he picks it up there. lkft just found a build failure: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/users/arnd.bergmann/asm-generic/-/jobs/2691154818 I have not investigated what went wrong, but it does look like an actual regression, so I'll wait for Lukas to follow up with a new version of the patch. Arnd