On 7/1/22 3:52 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:13:36PM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:38 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 06:28:10AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
Commit f36600634282 ("libbpf: move xsk.{c,h} into selftests/bpf") moves
files tools/{lib => testing/selftests}/bpf/xsk.[ch], but misses to adjust
the XDP SOCKETS (AF_XDP) section in MAINTAINERS.
Adjust the file entry after this file movement.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Andrii, please ack.
Alexei, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up on top of the commit above.
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index fa4bfa3d10bf..27d9e65b9a85 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -22042,7 +22042,7 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/xdp_diag.h
F: include/net/netns/xdp.h
F: net/xdp/
F: samples/bpf/xdpsock*
-F: tools/lib/bpf/xsk*
+F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk*
Magnus, this doesn't cover xdpxceiver.
How about we move the lib part and xdpxceiver part to a dedicated
directory? Or would it be too nested from main dir POV?
Or we can just call everything we add xsk* something?
No strong feelings. test_xsk.sh probably also needs to be addressed.
That's why I proposed dedicated dir.
Could one of you follow-up on this for bpf-next tree? Maybe for selftests something
similar as in case of the XDP entry could work.
Thanks,
Daniel
