> It can be determined that the proposed approach for the detection of > questionable source code places is incomplete (also because of the current > development status for the Coccinelle software). > Thus I suggest to reconsider the usage of the word “every” for the patch message > once more. I'm not against changing the patch's subject. Would you find it better if it was "coccinelle: Extend address test from ifaddr to test expressions"? And what about you Julia? > Will further adjustments become helpful for desired source code analyses > and corresponding transformations? Do you mean adjustments in this semantic patch or in the coccinelle software? Thanks, Jérémy