Le 16/05/2022 à 17:01, David Sterba a écrit :
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 04:54:07PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 06:57:25AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2022/5/14 20:01, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
If alloc_dummy_extent_buffer() we should return an error code, not 0 that
would mean success.
Fixes: a1fc41ac28d3 ("btrfs: use dummy extent buffer for super block sys chunk array read")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
All my fault, thanks for catching it.
Qu
I sent this patch in January and David was going to fold it into the
original patch but it got lost. Thanks, Christophe!
Hi,
Not exactly.
Your patch was:
- if (IS_ERR(sb))
- return PTR_ERR(sb);
+ if (!sb)
+ return -ENOMEM;
Mine is only:
- return PTR_ERR(sb);
+ return -ENOMEM;
So for some reason, what you had reported was just half applied. (or
half fixed by someone else)
I found my reply to your fix that I folded the fixup, but then it got
lost for some reason. Probably because I picked the patchset from
mailing list again and did not take the local branch. I'll fold the fix
again as it' still in the unmerged branch. Thanks.
just in case, the Fixes tag in Dan's patch leads to:
"Notice: this object is not reachable from any branch."
I don't think that it is of any importance if the fix in folded, but in
case, I let you know.
CJ
