Quoting Dan Carpenter (2022-03-16 01:35:33)
> This code was using -1 to represent that there was no reset function.
> Unfortunately, the -1 was stored in u8 so the if (clks[i].rs_id >= 0)
> condition was always true. This lead to an out of bounds access in
> visconti_clk_register_gates().
>
> Fixes: b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
