There are some spelling mistakes in some literal strings. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c index 07f26718b66f..99abd0fe7f15 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c @@ -4623,12 +4623,12 @@ static void _show_cx_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m) ver_hotfix = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 8), chip->wlcx_desired); seq_printf(m, "(%s, desired:%d.%d.%d), ", (wl->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->wlcx_desired ? - "Match" : "Mis-Match"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix); + "Match" : "Mismatch"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix); seq_printf(m, "BT_FW_coex:%d(%s, desired:%d)\n", bt->ver_info.fw_coex, (bt->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->btcx_desired ? - "Match" : "Mis-Match"), chip->btcx_desired); + "Match" : "Mismatch"), chip->btcx_desired); if (bt->enable.now && bt->ver_info.fw == 0) rtw89_btc_fw_en_rpt(rtwdev, RPT_EN_BT_VER_INFO, true); @@ -5075,7 +5075,7 @@ static void _show_dm_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m) seq_printf(m, "leak_ap:%d, fw_offload:%s%s\n", dm->leak_ap, (BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ? "Y" : "N"), (dm->wl_fw_cx_offload == BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ? - "" : "(Mis-Match!!)")); + "" : "(Mismatch!!)")); if (dm->rf_trx_para.wl_tx_power == 0xff) seq_printf(m, -- 2.35.1
