Re: [PATCH] scsi: message: fusion: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in non-atomic context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: message: fusion: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in non-atomic context
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:21:50 -0500
Cc: Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <eccb2179ce800529851ed4fabc9d3f95fbbf7d7f.1644906731.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (Christophe JAILLET's message of "Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:32:34 +0100")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <eccb2179ce800529851ed4fabc9d3f95fbbf7d7f.1644906731.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Christophe,

> Just a few lines below this kzalloc() we have a mutex_lock() which can
> sleep.

Applied to 5.18/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: message: fusion: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in non-atomic context
  - From: Christophe JAILLET

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: make array voice_priority static const
Next by Date: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: fix use after free in gdm_lte_rx()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] scsi: message: fusion: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in non-atomic context
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: message: fusion: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC in non-atomic context
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux