On 2/22/22 08:43, Dan Carpenter wrote:
These tests are supposed to check if the loop exited via a break or not. However the tests are wrong because if we did not exit via a break then "p" is not a valid pointer. In that case, it's the equivalent of "if (*(u32 *)sr == *last_key) {". That's going to work most of the time, but there is a potential for those to be equal. Fixes: 1593123a6a49 ("tipc: add name table dump to new netlink api") Fixes: 1a1a143daf84 ("tipc: add publication dump to new netlink api") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/tipc/name_table.c | 2 +- net/tipc/socket.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/tipc/name_table.c b/net/tipc/name_table.c index 01396dd1c899..1d8ba233d047 100644 --- a/net/tipc/name_table.c +++ b/net/tipc/name_table.c @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int __tipc_nl_add_nametable_publ(struct tipc_nl_msg *msg, list_for_each_entry(p, &sr->all_publ, all_publ) if (p->key == *last_key) break; - if (p->key != *last_key) + if (list_entry_is_head(p, &sr->all_publ, all_publ)) return -EPIPE; } else { p = list_first_entry(&sr->all_publ, diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 3e63c83e641c..7545321c3440 100644 --- a/net/tipc/socket.c +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c @@ -3749,7 +3749,7 @@ static int __tipc_nl_list_sk_publ(struct sk_buff *skb, if (p->key == *last_publ) break; } - if (p->key != *last_publ) { + if (list_entry_is_head(p, &tsk->publications, binding_sock)) { /* We never set seq or call nl_dump_check_consistent() * this means that setting prev_seq here will cause the * consistence check to fail in the netlink callback
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx>