On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:30:08PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Patch 1 and 2 are just cleanups that uses 'bitmap_zalloc()' and 'bitmap_set()' > instead of hand-writing these functions. > > Patch 3 is more questionable. It replaces calls to '[set|clear]_bit()' by their > non-atomic '__[set|clear]_bit()' alternatives. > It looks safe to do so because accesses to the corresponding bitmaps are > protected by spinlocks. > However, this patch is compile-tested only. It is not sure that it worth > changing the code just for saving a few atomic operations. > So review, test and apply only if it make sense. > > Christophe JAILLET (3): > RDMA/cxgb4: Use bitmap_zalloc() when applicable > RDMA/cxgb4: Use bitmap_set() when applicable > RDMA/cxgb4: Use non-atomic bitmap functions when possible Applied to for-next, thanks Jason
