[PATCH -next] pinctrl: samsung: Make symbol 'exynos7885_pin_ctrl' static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The sparse tool complains as follows:

drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c:490:31: warning:
 symbol 'exynos7885_pin_ctrl' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c, so marks
it static.

Fixes: b0ef7b1a7a07 ("pinctrl: samsung: Add Exynos7885 SoC specific data")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
index b174796081ef..2e490e7696f4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static const struct samsung_pin_bank_data exynos7885_pin_banks3[] __initconst =
 	EXYNOS850_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x200, "gpc2", 0x40),
 };
 
-const struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos7885_pin_ctrl[] __initconst = {
+static const struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos7885_pin_ctrl[] __initconst = {
 	{
 		/* pin-controller instance 0 Alive data */
 		.pin_banks	= exynos7885_pin_banks0,




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux