The code in 'hci_dat_v1_get_index()' really looks like a hand coded version
of 'for_each_set_bit()', except that a +1 is missing when searching for the
next set bit.
This really looks odd and it seems that it will loop until 'dat_w0_read()'
returns the expected result.
So use 'for_each_set_bit()' instead. It is less verbose and should be more
correct.
Fixes: 9ad9a52cce28 ("i3c/master: introduce the mipi-i3c-hci driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Speculative fix. Untested.
---
drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
index 783e551a2c85..97bb49ff5b53 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
@@ -160,9 +160,7 @@ static int hci_dat_v1_get_index(struct i3c_hci *hci, u8 dev_addr)
unsigned int dat_idx;
u32 dat_w0;
- for (dat_idx = find_first_bit(hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries);
- dat_idx < hci->DAT_entries;
- dat_idx = find_next_bit(hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries, dat_idx)) {
+ for_each_set_bit(dat_idx, hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries) {
dat_w0 = dat_w0_read(dat_idx);
if (FIELD_GET(DAT_0_DYNAMIC_ADDRESS, dat_w0) == dev_addr)
return dat_idx;
--
2.30.2
