It looks like
port_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
might've meant to read
port_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(port_pdev);
in which case the assignment would be used. I have no strong opinions
either way.
Full context for those following along at home:
```
static struct apple_pcie_port *apple_pcie_get_port(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct pci_config_window *cfg = pdev->sysdata;
struct apple_pcie *pcie = cfg->priv;
struct pci_dev *port_pdev = pdev;
struct apple_pcie_port *port;
/* Find the root port this device is on */
port_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
/* If finding the port itself, nothing to do */
if (WARN_ON(!port_pdev) || pdev == port_pdev)
return NULL;
list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, entry) {
if (port->idx == PCI_SLOT(port_pdev->devfn))
return port;
}
return NULL;
}
```
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The pointer port_pdev is being initialized with a value that is never
> read, it is being updated later on. The assignment is redundant and
> can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> index b4db7a065553..19fd2d38aaab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static struct apple_pcie_port *apple_pcie_get_port(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct pci_config_window *cfg = pdev->sysdata;
> struct apple_pcie *pcie = cfg->priv;
> - struct pci_dev *port_pdev = pdev;
> + struct pci_dev *port_pdev;
> struct apple_pcie_port *port;
>
> /* Find the root port this device is on */
> --
> 2.32.0
>
