On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:59:13AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The variable dev_ctl is being initialized with a value that is never
> read, it is being updated later on. The assignment is redundant and
> can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
I'll never get a public reference to what those things mean, will I?
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
> index 8c4d947fb848..a337f7afc3b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(
> * provide if we could simply hardcode everything into a single struct.
> */
> p = NULL;
> - dev_ctl = edac_align_ptr(&p, sizeof(*dev_ctl), 1);
Are you absolutely sure this function doesn't have any side-effects,
say, to &p and removing the call would break the pointer offsets for the
one-shot allocation?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
