2021-09-07 17:01 GMT+09:00, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On (21/09/07 10:33), Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> Smatch complains that there are some paths where "rc" is not set.
>>
>> Fixes: eb5784f0c6ef ("ksmbd: ensure error is surfaced in
>> set_file_basic_info()")
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
>> index a350e1cef7f4..c86164dc70bb 100644
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
>> @@ -5444,7 +5444,7 @@ static int set_file_basic_info(struct ksmbd_file
>> *fp, char *buf,
>> struct file *filp;
>> struct inode *inode;
>> struct user_namespace *user_ns;
>> - int rc;
>> + int rc = 0;
>>
>> if (!(fp->daccess & FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES_LE))
>> return -EACCES;
>
> It sort of feels like that `rc' is not needed there at all. It's being used
> in
>
> rc = ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr(user_ns,
> filp->f_path.dentry,
> &da);
> if (rc)
> ksmbd_debug(SMB,
> "failed to restore file attribute in
> EA\n");
>
> and in
>
> rc = setattr_prepare(user_ns, dentry, &attrs);
> if (rc)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Either it should be used more, and probably be a return value, or we can
> just remove it.
This patch is correct. But I have already fixed it.
You can understand it if you check #ksmbd-for-next branch, not master.
https://git.samba.org/?p=ksmbd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ksmbd-for-next
Thanks!
>
