Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The continue statement at the end of a for-loop has no effect,
> remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> index 0f021909b430..b615a980f563 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
> @@ -860,7 +860,6 @@ static int igc_phc_get_syncdevicetime(ktime_t *device,
> * so write the previous error status to clear it.
> */
> wr32(IGC_PTM_STAT, stat);
> - continue;
Just a bit of background.
I added the "continue" here more as documentation: we handled an error,
and we want to try again, I felt that the continue helps making that
clearer.
But I am not completely opposed about removing it.
> }
> } while (--count);
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
