On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 10:02:59PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. > > The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below. > > It has been compile tested. This should not be in commit message. It is unrelevant after this patch is merged. It should be between --- <here> --- It is still good info to give. Argillander > > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE > + DMA_TO_DEVICE > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE > > @@ > @@ > - PCI_DMA_NONE > + DMA_NONE > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; > @@ > - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) > + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) > + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML: > https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4 > --- > drivers/misc/mei/pci-txe.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-txe.c b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-txe.c > index aec0483b8e72..fa20d9a27813 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/mei/pci-txe.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/pci-txe.c > @@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ static int mei_txe_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) > goto end; > } > > - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36)); > + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36)); > if (err) { > - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > if (err) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No suitable DMA available.\n"); > goto end; > -- > 2.30.2 >
