Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc128s052: Simplify 'adc128_probe()'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 26/08/2021 à 20:28, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
Turn 'adc128_probe()' into a full resource managed function to simplify the
code.

This way, the .remove function can be removed.
Doing so, the only 'spi_get_drvdata()' call is removed and the
corresponding 'spi_set_drvdata()' can be removed as well.

Suggested-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Compile tested only.

When reviewing, pay special attention to the 'spi_set_drvdata()' call
removal. I recently introduced a regression with a too aggressive cleanup
like that.

This patch should be applied after
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/f33069f0-601b-4bbb-3766-026f7a161912-39ZsbGIQGT5GWvitb5QawA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#meb792dcd6540f87d9ae041660ca4738a776e924a

v1 --> v2: Simplify 'adc128_disable_regulator()'
---
  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
index e1afdb775100..3143f35a6509 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
@@ -132,13 +132,6 @@ static const struct iio_info adc128_info = {
  	.read_raw = adc128_read_raw,
  };
-static void adc128_disable_regulator(void *data)
-{
-	struct regulator *reg = data;
-
-	regulator_disable(reg);
-}
-
  static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
  {
  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
@@ -158,6 +151,8 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
  	adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
  	adc->spi = spi;
+ spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
+
  	indio_dev->name = spi_get_device_id(spi)->name;
  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
  	indio_dev->info = &adc128_info;
@@ -172,13 +167,23 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
  	ret = regulator_enable(adc->reg);
  	if (ret < 0)
  		return ret;
-	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, adc128_disable_regulator, adc->reg);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
mutex_init(&adc->lock); - return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
+	ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int adc128_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
+	struct adc128 *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+
+	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
+	regulator_disable(adc->reg);
+
+	return 0;
  }
static const struct of_device_id adc128_of_match[] = {
@@ -220,6 +225,7 @@ static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
  		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
  	},
  	.probe = adc128_probe,
+	.remove = adc128_remove,
  	.id_table = adc128_id,
  };
  module_spi_driver(adc128_driver);

NACK

I messed-up everything and this v2 is just garbage
Sorry for the noise.

CJ



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux